security concerns
-
A New Record High: Non-Zero BTC Addresses Reach 45,506,505
According to reports, Glassnode data shows that the number of non zero BTC addresses reached 45506505, setting a new record high.
The number of non zero BTC addresses has reached a -
Degen Zoo: Everything You Need to Know About the Recent Hack on Binance Oracle
On April 2nd, according to the official Telegram announcement, the DAO Maker project Degen Zoo was suspected of being hacked on Binance Oracle. The project team has currently suspe
-
#The Flourishing Blockchain as A Service Market: A Comprehensive Analysis
On March 29th, according to a comprehensive research report from Market Research Future (MRFR), the Blockchain as a Service Market is expected to flourish with a healthy CAGR of ab
-
Smartest Money Transfers $14 Million Worth of ETH to Binance
According to reports, according to Lookonchain monitoring, a Smartest Money transferred 7868 ETHs (valued at approximately $14 million) to Binance two hours ago. Before FTX suspend
-
Potential Security Concerns with Shibarium Layer2 Solution by Shiba Inu
According to reports, Twitter user @ Rancune_ ETH disclosed that the chain ID shown in the preview image of Shibarium, a Layer2 solution launched by Shiba Inu, was found to be the same as that of Rinia. In addition, the project team was also found to have unlocked the $5 million Shibarium token BONE. Twitter user: Shibarium or plagiarizing Rinia, $5 million BONE unlocked Analysis based on this information:A recent report has emerged on Twitter regarding potential security concerns with Shibarium, a Layer2 solution launched by the blockchain project of the popular Shiba Inu cryptocurrency. The report comes from Twitter user @Rancune_ETH, who claims that the chain ID displayed in Shibarium’s preview image is identical to that of Rinia, another blockchain project. This finding raises questions about the legitimacy of Shibarium and its underlying technology. If Shibarium is using the same chain ID as Rinia, it could indicate that the platform is not as unique or innovative as it claims…