1. PixelPlaygroundHome
  2. Blockchain Briefs

Custodian Bank Denied Federal Reserve Supervision

• Blockchain Briefs • 156 views

It is reported that Custodia Bank, the custodian bank of Caitlin Long, received a second refusal from the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve Board of the Uni…

Custodian Bank Denied Federal Reserve Supervision

It is reported that Custodia Bank, the custodian bank of Caitlin Long, received a second refusal from the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve Board of the United States announced on February 23 that it had rejected the request of custodian banks to seek supervision from government agencies.

The Federal Reserve once again rejected the regulatory application of the custodian bank Avanti

Interpretation of the news:


According to recent reports, Custodia Bank, the custodian bank of Caitlin Long, has been denied Federal Reserve supervision. The Federal Reserve Board of the United States, which determines the policies of the US Federal Reserve, announced on February 23 that it had rejected the request of custodian banks to seek supervision from government agencies.

This announcement has implications in the overall financial landscape, as custodian banks play significant roles in ensuring that investments and assets are securely held and managed. Custodian banks are responsible for safeguarding client assets, processing transactions, and settling trades.

The rejection of the plea of Custodia Bank suggests that, at least for the time being, custodian banks will have to operate without direct oversight and regulation from the Federal Reserve. In essence, this means that custodian banks may not be subject to strict and uniform regulations that could ensure their reliability and transparency.

The reasons behind the Federal Reserve Board’s decision are not clear at this point, but it is safe to assume that it has something to do with the Federal Reserve’s stance on decentralization and self-governance. It is also possible that the current regulatory framework in place is deemed sufficient and that adding another layer of regulation may not be necessary.

The denial of Federal Reserve supervision could have a significant impact on the custodian bank landscape, as it could make it more difficult for new entrants to this market to obtain licenses and credibility. It could also discourage stricter self-regulation by custodian banks, which may prefer not to go through the process of seeking government supervision.

Overall, the denial of Federal Reserve supervision for custodian banks like Custodia Bank signals a shift in the regulatory landscape for these institutions. It will be interesting to see how the industry responds to this development and how it will impact the overall stability and integrity of the financial system.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/3369/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 02/26/2023 19:51
Next 02/26/2023 20:43

Recommended articles