1. PixelPlaygroundHome
  2. Web3 News

Silicon Valley Bank’s Unusual Funding Strategy

• Web3 News • 154 views

According to reports, John Cronin, an analyst at Goodbody, a stock broker, said, \”Silicon Valley Bank is a unique example because it relies heavily on commerci…

Silicon Valley Banks Unusual Funding Strategy

According to reports, John Cronin, an analyst at Goodbody, a stock broker, said, “Silicon Valley Bank is a unique example because it relies heavily on commercial deposit financing. The massive outflow of corporate deposits experienced by Silicon Valley Bank forces it to liquidate investment securities to make up for the capital gap, which is not the trend we see in British banks. I think the market has overreacted”.

Goodbody analyst, stock broker: The market overreacted to the bank event in Silicon Valley

Analysis based on this information:


Goodbody analyst John Cronin recently commented on the funding strategy of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), a stock broker operating in the United States. According to Cronin, SVB’s financing strategy is unique because the bank relies heavily on commercial deposit financing. This funding source has been significant in SVB’s operations, particularly because of the massive outflow of corporate deposits the bank has experienced. The bank’s unusual financing strategy and the unexpected outflow of corporate deposits have forced SVB to liquidate investment securities, which is not a trend commonly observed in British banks.

Cronin’s statements suggest that SVB’s unique financing strategy has led to market overreaction. In other words, the bank’s reliance on commercial deposit financing coupled with the forced liquidation of investment securities has sparked some concerns in the market. However, Cronin argues that the market may be overreacting because SVB’s financial strategies and performance are not in line with British banks. Essentially, Cronin is suggesting that the market may be basing their opinions on SVB’s financial performance by comparing it to the traditional practices of British banks, which may not be an accurate comparison given the unique circumstances surrounding SVB’s operations.

SVB’s unconventional financing strategy means that the bank’s liquidity is tied to commercial deposits. Additionally, this strategy results in the forced liquidation of investment securities when corporate deposits experience significant outflows. The forced liquidation of investment securities is a significant disadvantage of SVB’s strategy because liquidation under duress can result in lower returns. Consequently, an unexpected reduction in commercial deposit financing can lead to a substantial fall in SVB’s investment income, as well as a potential decrease in the bank’s overall earnings.

In conclusion, Cronin’s remarks highlight the unique funding strategy employed by Silicon Valley Bank, which appears to be under scrutiny by the market. The bank’s heavy reliance on commercial deposit financing has left the bank vulnerable to significant outflows of corporate deposits. To manage liquidity gaps, SVB resorts to liquidating investment securities, which can lead to lower returns for the bank. As such, market participants may observe SVB’s financial performance through a distorted lens when comparing it to the traditional financing methods of British banks.

Overall, it is crucial for market participants to consider the nuances of SVB’s financing methods when evaluating the bank’s performance. Comparisons to British banks or relying on traditional metrics may not present an accurate picture of the bank’s financial health and operations.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/8436/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 03/10/2023 10:09
Next 03/10/2023 10:24

Recommended articles