1. PixelPlaygroundHome
  2. Blockchain Briefs

Court rules that SBF’s co-signer names must be disclosed

• Blockchain Briefs • 173 views

It is reported that after SBF did not apply to the Court of Appeal, a federal judge ruled that the names of the co-signers of the bonds of Sam Bankman-Frie (SB…

Court rules that SBFs co-signer names must be disclosed

It is reported that after SBF did not apply to the Court of Appeal, a federal judge ruled that the names of the co-signers of the bonds of Sam Bankman-Frie (SBF) should be disclosed. Lewis Kaplan, a District Judge for the Southern District of New York, initially made a ruling in favor of news organizations including CoinDesk. The latter believed that it was in the public interest to disclose the name of the signer of the SBF, but said that the decision was pending appeal. SBF said in a new ruling on Wednesday that the lawyers had issued a notice that they would appeal, but did not file an actual appeal.

The research director and former dean of Stanford University was revealed to be the bond signer of SBF

Interpretation of the news:


A legal battle involving Sam Bankman-Frie (SBF), the co-founder of crypto exchange FTX, has reached a new stage as a federal judge in New York ruled that the names of SBF’s bond co-signers must be disclosed. The decision comes after news organizations, including CoinDesk, argued that the disclosure is in the public interest. This ruling was made as SBF failed to apply to the Court of Appeal, which means that the lower court decision stands.

Earlier, District Judge Lewis Kaplan made a ruling in favor of the news organizations and argued that disclosing the names of SBF’s bond co-signers is reasonable given the public’s interest in transparency. However, the decision was not final, as SBF was expected to file an appeal. In recent developments, SBF’s lawyers issued a notice of appeal but did not file one, which means that the lower court ruling stands.

SBF’s bond co-signers are parties who have agreed to pay a certain amount of money in case SBF fails to deliver the promised returns. The controversy surrounding the identity of these bond co-signers is related to concerns over the credibility of SBF’s investments as well as the larger cryptocurrency market. To ensure transparency and accountability, news organizations and other stakeholders have been calling for full disclosure of the identity of SBF’s bond co-signers.

The legal battle over the disclosure of SBF’s bond co-signers is significant because it highlights ongoing concerns about transparency and accountability in the cryptocurrency sector. It also underscores the growing importance of legal mechanisms in regulating the cryptocurrency market. The decision by the federal judge sets a positive precedent for other cases that will come before the court in the future.

In conclusion, the ruling by the federal judge that SBF’s bond co-signers must be disclosed comes as a significant development in the ongoing legal battle over transparency and accountability in the cryptocurrency sector. The decision highlights the importance of legal mechanisms in regulating the market and sets a positive precedent for future cases. The case is a reminder that transparency and accountability are essential elements in building credibility and trust in the cryptocurrency market.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/721/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 02/16/2023 20:32
Next 02/16/2023 20:44

Recommended articles