1. PixelPlaygroundHome
  2. Blockchain Briefs

South Dakota’s Attempt to Redefine Currency: Bitcoin Not Considered

• Blockchain Briefs • 136 views

On March 2, South Dakota, the United States, is taking action to try to redefine the composition of currency, and involves the classification of cryptocurrency…

South Dakotas Attempt to Redefine Currency: Bitcoin Not Considered

On March 2, South Dakota, the United States, is taking action to try to redefine the composition of currency, and involves the classification of cryptocurrency. A bill in the state entitled “Amendment to the Uniform Commercial Code” indicates that digital currencies such as Bitcoin will be excluded from the definition of currency because they come from individuals or organizations. According to the proposed amendment, a possible medium of exchange will only be recognized as currency if it is “authorized or adopted” by the government.

South Dakota proposed a bill to change the definition of currency and exclude digital currency

Interpretation of the news:


The state of South Dakota in the United States is taking action to redefine currency and classify cryptocurrency. In a proposed bill called “Amendment to the Uniform Commercial Code,” South Dakota aims to exclude digital currencies such as Bitcoin from the definition of currency. The reason for this is because Bitcoins are not issued by governments or financial institutions, but rather by individuals or organizations. The bill suggests that a possible medium of exchange will only be recognized as currency if it is “authorized or adopted” by the government.

South Dakota’s decision to exclude Bitcoin and other digital currencies from the definition of currency is not surprising because Bitcoin has always been a point of contention when it comes to its classification. Bitcoin is not backed by a central government or an institution, making it decentralized and unregulated. This means that transactions using Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are not monitored and recorded by a central authority, which has led to concerns about their usage in illegal activities like money laundering and drug trades.

South Dakota’s move to redefine currency and exclude Bitcoin may have some far-reaching implications on the use of digital currencies. One potential effect is that digital currencies may lose their legitimacy as a currency option. If South Dakota’s bill is adopted by other states and eventually becomes a federal law, it means that Bitcoin and other digital currencies may no longer be used interchangeably with traditional currencies like the US dollar. Furthermore, digital currencies may also lose their appeal as a method of payment, as merchants may be less inclined to accept them if they are not recognized as legitimate currency.

While South Dakota’s bill to redefine currency and exclude Bitcoin could potentially impact the usage of digital currencies, it is important to note that this is still a proposed bill, and its adoption is not guaranteed. In addition, the effect of this bill on digital currencies will depend on whether other states follow suit and if it eventually becomes a federal law. Nonetheless, it is an important development in the ongoing debate about the legitimacy of digital currencies and their usage as a medium of exchange.

In conclusion, South Dakota’s attempt to redefine currency and classify cryptocurrency has sparked a debate about the classification of digital currencies. If the bill becomes law, Bitcoin and other digital currencies may lose their status as a legitimate currency option. This could have wide-ranging implications, including a decrease in acceptance by merchants and the loss of interest in these currencies as a method of payment.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/4537/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 03/02/2023 10:05
Next 03/02/2023 10:21

Recommended articles