1. PixelPlaygroundHome
  2. Web3 News

Failed Proposal for Governance Suspensions

• Web3 News • 163 views

On February 27, the governance page showed that the proposal of Neutrino to \”suspend or terminate the current governance before the release of the road map\” wa…

Failed Proposal for Governance Suspensions

On February 27, the governance page showed that the proposal of Neutrino to “suspend or terminate the current governance before the release of the road map” was not voted. Although the support rate of the proposal reached 92%, the total number of votes did not reach the quorum.

Neutrino’s proposal to “suspend or terminate current governance before the release of the road map” was not passed

Interpretation of the news:


The governance page reported on February 27 that a proposal presented by Neutrino to suspend or terminate the current governance before the release of a roadmap was not voted. This means that the proposal did not pass into law as there were not enough votes. Despite the proposal being widely supported, reaching a 92% support rate, unfortunately, the total number of votes did not exceed the quorum.

One possible interpretation of this message is that Neutrino had concerns about the current state of the governance system within the company. Their proposal suggests that they either wanted the current governance system to be temporarily suspended or terminated entirely. The reason for this request may have been that they believed that the governance system was inadequate or not functioning in a way that aligns with the company’s overall mission.

The fact that the proposal failed to pass is not uncommon. It is common for proposed changes in companies to be discussed and then ultimately rejected because they do not meet the standards set out by the company or are voted against by the broader community. Companies are governed by a set of rules and regulations, which are in place to ensure that they operate in an ethical manner, and changing these rules requires a lot of support from stakeholders within the company.

The message also suggests that although the proposal had strong support, the total number of votes did not reach the quorum. This suggests that those who did not vote chose not to do so because they were indifferent, unaware of the proposal, or did not think that their vote mattered. This highlights the importance of stakeholders engaging in company governance as it ensures that key decisions are made in a transparent manner and that everyone’s views are taken into account.

In conclusion, this message highlights the importance of good governance and the need for companies to engage in structured governance processes. The proposal by Neutrino to suspend the current governance before releasing the roadmap was not voted, and this shows that any request to change governance rules must be supported by a significant number of stakeholders. Ultimately, the governance processes put in place are there to ensure that everyone has a say in decision-making processes, and it is important to recognize the value of individual voices in driving these processes forward.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/3639/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 02/27/2023 05:46
Next 02/27/2023 05:56

Recommended articles