Dedaub’s proposal to use Verkle tree to reduce gas cost in Ethereum

It is reported that the security company Dedaub sent a message on social media suggesting that Ethereum should use the more advantageous Verkle tree to reduce …

Dedaubs proposal to use Verkle tree to reduce gas cost in Ethereum

It is reported that the security company Dedaub sent a message on social media suggesting that Ethereum should use the more advantageous Verkle tree to reduce the gas cost. Unlike Merkle-Patricia, Verkle tree can enable encrypted secure light clients and can support “state witness” to minimize data transmission. If the state access cost is fully measured and corresponds to the size of “state witness”, the stateless client network will not be attacked by DoS. In this regard, Curve Finance, the DeFi protocol, believes that the proposal is “absolutely harmful” and will “kill DeFi on the main network”, and expresses the hope of further communication to explore other solutions.

The security company Dedaub proposed to use Verkle tree to reduce gas costs, which was opposed by Curve Finance

Interpretation of the news:


Dedaub, a security company, recently sent a message on social media proposing that Ethereum use a more beneficial Verkle tree instead of Merkle-Patricia to reduce the gas cost. This proposal suggests that Verkle tree will bring significant benefits to Ethereum as its encrypted secure light clients can support “state witness” and reduce data transmission, thus enabling stateless client networks. By fully measuring the state access cost and coordinating with the size of “state witness,” this solution can prevent the network from being attacked by the denial-of-service (DoS) attack.

However, Curve Finance, one of the most popular decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols in the Ethereum ecosystem, has expressed its concern about Dedaub’s proposal. The company thinks this proposal is “absolutely harmful” and will “kill DeFi on the main network.” The DeFi protocol suggests exploring other solutions and welcomes further communication to address issues more effectively.

On the one hand, the adoption of Verkle trees has the potential to reduce the gas cost, which might attract more users to the Ethereum network. With this solution, encrypted secure light clients can reduce the transmission fees and further reduce the gas cost. Additionally, Verkle trees will allow stateless clients to interact with the blockchain, eliminating the need for clients to store a large amount of data, thus promoting scalability.

On the other hand, Curve Finance’s opposition to this proposal highlights the need for critical evaluation before implementing new technologies. These evaluations must take into account the potential risks that new technologies pose. Curve Finance believes that introducing Verkle trees may negatively impact DeFi protocols. Thus, the community needs to initiate a dialogue to identify and avoid potential problems that could arise.

In conclusion, Dedaub’s proposal to use Verkle trees to reduce gas cost in Ethereum has advantages and disadvantages, making it imperative to explore different alternatives. By doing so, the Ethereum community can evaluate the pros and cons of this proposal and find an optimal solution for the long-term sustainability and health of the network.

Total words: 405

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/3425/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.