1. PixelPlaygroundHome
  2. Metaverse Insights

The Chamber of Digital Commerce Criticizes the SEC’s Insider Trading Case against Coinbase Employees

• Metaverse Insights • 157 views

It is reported that in a non-party opinion statement submitted to the court, the Chamber of Digital Commerce, headquartered in the United States, believed that…

The Chamber of Digital Commerce Criticizes the SEC’s Insider Trading Case against Coinbase Employees

It is reported that in a non-party opinion statement submitted to the court, the Chamber of Digital Commerce, headquartered in the United States, believed that the insider trading case of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against the former employees of Coinbase should be rejected, because it represents the expansion of the enforcement and supervision movement of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and tried to characterize the secondary market transactions of cryptocurrency as securities transactions. The Digital Chamber of Commerce stressed that the US SEC had never been authorized by Congress to invade the digital asset market, and pointed out that in other cases of the Supreme Court, regulators must first be authorized by Congress.

American Digital Chamber of Commerce: The SEC’s insider trading case against former employees of Coinbase should be rejected

Interpretation of the news:


The Chamber of Digital Commerce, a US-based organization that advocates for the adoption of blockchain and digital assets, recently made a non-party opinion statement regarding the insider trading case of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against former Coinbase employees. In their statement, the Chamber argued that the SEC’s case was flawed and should be dismissed, as it represents an overreach by the agency in its enforcement and supervision of the digital asset market.

According to the Chamber, the SEC’s attempt to label the secondary market transactions of cryptocurrency as securities transactions is unfounded, as there is no legal basis for doing so. The organization pointed out that the SEC has not been authorized by Congress to regulate the digital asset market and that its actions represent an expansion of its powers without proper legal justification.

The assertion made by the Chamber is particularly relevant given the ongoing debate around the classification of cryptocurrencies and digital assets. While some argue that they should be considered securities, others argue that they are a new asset class that requires a different regulatory framework. The SEC’s case against the Coinbase employees appears to blur the lines between these positions, and the Chamber’s statement signals a challenge to the SEC’s authority in this matter.

Furthermore, the Chamber’s statement draws on previous cases that established the need for regulatory bodies to be authorized by Congress before taking regulatory action. This emphasizes the legal limits of the SEC’s power and suggests that they are overstepping their legal boundaries in this particular instance.

Overall, the Chamber’s non-party opinion statement is a significant development in the ongoing debate around the regulation of the digital asset market. It raises important questions about the SEC’s authority and power, as well as the proper regulatory framework for emerging assets like cryptocurrencies.

In conclusion, the headline “The Chamber of Digital Commerce Criticizes the SEC’s Insider Trading Case against Coinbase Employees” accurately summarizes the key message of the Chamber’s non-party opinion statement, while the keywords “SEC,” “Coinbase,” “insider trading,” “digital assets,” and “Chamber of Digital Commerce” highlight the most salient points.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/2719/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 02/23/2023 05:59
Next 02/23/2023 06:42

Recommended articles