1. PixelPlaygroundHome
  2. Metaverse Insights

Fixing the Incorrect Referendum and Resetting the Watr Parallel Chain Creation Block: Polkadot Committee’s Proposal No. 393

• Metaverse Insights • 150 views

On April 27th, the Polkadot Committee passed Proposal No. 393 to fix the incorrect referendum caused by Substrate errors and correctly reset the Watr parallel chain creation block.

Fixing the Incorrect Referendum and Resetting the Watr Parallel Chain Creation Block: Polkadot Committees Proposal No. 393

On April 27th, the Polkadot Committee passed Proposal No. 393 to fix the incorrect referendum caused by Substrate errors and correctly reset the Watr parallel chain creation block.

Polkadot Proposal 393 will fix incorrect referendums caused by Substrate errors

The Polkadot Committee passed Proposal No. 393 on April 27th, 2021, to address and fix the issue of the incorrect referendum caused by substrate errors and to correctly reset the Watr parallel chain creation block. This proposal is of great significance to the Polkadot ecosystem and is aimed at avoiding any potential security risks and improving network performance. This article will explore the motives behind Proposal No. 393, its implications for the Polkadot network, and how it will impact users.

Understanding the Problematic Referendum and Substrate Errors

Before diving into the details of Proposal No.393, it is essential to understand the background of the problematic referendum and substrate errors. In late March 2021, Polkadot held a successful vote, approving a referendum known as the “Karura Special.” However, after reviewing the results of the vote, it was discovered that the referendum was mistakenly approved due to substrate errors.
Substrate is a blockchain development framework that enables the creation of powerful, customized blockchains. The errors in the substrate resulted in the approval of the Karura Special referendum accidentally. Consequently, the Polkadot team realized that this error could pose potential security risks and create confusion in the network.

Fixing the Incorrect Referendum: Proposal No. 393

Proposal No. 393 is a measure aimed at fixing the incorrect Karura Special referendum caused by substrate errors. It proposes changes to the Polkadot code to implement a “delayed reversion,” which would create a mechanism to validate referenda that were passed as a result of a critical error, such as substrate errors.
The delayed reversion would first re-submit the referendum for voting, allowing the Polkadot community to vote again with the correct information about the referendum. Once the result of the referendum is obtained, the network will then automatically reverse the incorrect outcome to reflect the community’s response to the referendum.
This mechanism provides an effective way of dealing with potential errors in the future, ensuring that the referenda are accurately recorded and the network is safe for all users.

The Implications of Proposal No. 393 for the Polkadot Network

Proposal No. 393 has several implications for the Polkadot network. Firstly, its implementation is expected to enhance the network’s security by preventing any potential security risks posed by substrate errors. Secondly, it will help to maintain the integrity of the referenda procedure, removing any doubt over the accuracy of the system. Finally, the proposal will contribute to the better performance of the network by ensuring that the Polkadot community’s voice is heard.
Overall, the implementation of Proposal No. 393 will maintain the trust of Polkadot users and ensure the long-term stability of the network.

How Will Proposal No. 393 Impact Users?

Users of the Polkadot network can expect to benefit from the implementation of Proposal No. 393. The proposal will maintain the integrity of the network, ensuring that users can carry out their transactions and access the network without any security concerns.
Furthermore, Proposal No. 393 demonstrates Polkadot’s commitment to creating a system that is safe and resilient to potential errors. This commitment inspires confidence among existing and potential users, and it is a significant step forward in the growth and development of the Polkadot network.

Conclusion

The approval of Proposal No. 393 on April 27th, 2021, is a clear indication of Polkadot’s commitment to creating a safe and secure network for all its users. By fixing the incorrect referendum caused by substrate errors through the implementation of the delayed reversion mechanism, the network’s integrity and security are guaranteed. Users can continue participating in the Polkadot ecosystem knowing that their interests are protected.

FAQs

1. What is substrate, and how does it affect the Polkadot network?
Substrate is a blockchain development framework that enables the creation of customized blockchains. It can affect the Polkadot network by exposing it to potential security risks.
2. How will delayed reversion work in the Polkadot network?
Delayed reversion creates a mechanism that allows the Polkadot network to validate referenda that were passed as a result of a critical error, such as substrate errors. It provides a mechanism to reverse the incorrect outcome, ensuring that the network accurately reflects the will of the community.
3. Can users continue to use the Polkadot network knowing that there were potential errors in the system?
Yes, users can continue to use the Polkadot network without worrying about security concerns. With Proposal No. 393, the integrity of the system is guaranteed, and the network is safer for all participants.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/18498/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 04/27/2023 09:45
Next 04/27/2023 10:12

Recommended articles