1. PixelPlaygroundHome
  2. Web3 News

Kraken Says No: Crypto Exchange Refuses IRS Request for Clients’ Identities

• Web3 News • 187 views

On April 27th, it was reported that in response to seeking court approval to confirm the identity of Kraken\’s encrypted clients on the crypto exchange in February, Kraken has appli

Kraken Says No: Crypto Exchange Refuses IRS Request for Clients’ Identities

On April 27th, it was reported that in response to seeking court approval to confirm the identity of Kraken’s encrypted clients on the crypto exchange in February, Kraken has applied to the federal court in San Francisco, United States to refuse the request from the Internal Revenue Service and stated that it is investigating users who may have underreported their tax obligations.

Kraken requests the court to refuse the request of the US Internal Revenue Service to request its encrypted customer identity

Introduction

On April 27th, Kraken, a popular cryptocurrency exchange, filed a motion asking a federal court in San Francisco to refuse a request from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to reveal the identities of its clients. The IRS had requested this information in February, seeking court approval to confirm the identity of Kraken’s encrypted clients. However, Kraken is standing up for its clients, claiming that it is investigating users who may have underreported their tax obligations.

The IRS vs. Kraken

Kraken’s move comes after a long-standing dispute between the IRS and cryptocurrency exchanges regarding the reporting and payment of taxes on virtual currencies. The IRS considers cryptocurrencies to be property, meaning that capital gains tax is due whenever a trader sells a coin for a profit. However, many traders have failed to report these transactions or have underreported them.
In February, the IRS sought court permission to access the identities of Kraken’s clients. However, Kraken has now filed a motion stating that the request is overreaching and should be refused. According to Kraken, the IRS is not seeking the identities of users suspected of wrongdoing, but rather all clients, including those who have done nothing wrong. Furthermore, Kraken argues that the IRS has not provided enough evidence to justify its request.

Kraken’s Response

In its motion, Kraken stated that it is already committed to identifying and investigating individuals who may have underreported their taxes. It claims to have already provided the IRS with information on over 20,000 accounts that conducted trades worth more than $20,000 between 2016 and 2020.
Kraken’s CEO, Jesse Powell, has spoken out against the IRS’s request, stating that it is unconstitutional and violates privacy rights. He also warned that the IRS’s actions could have a chilling effect on the cryptocurrency industry, driving traders and businesses away from the US and towards more privacy-friendly jurisdictions.

Conclusion

In the ongoing battle between the IRS and cryptocurrency exchanges, Kraken has taken a stand for its clients’ privacy. By refusing the IRS’s request for client identities, Kraken is sending a message that it will protect its users’ information and that it is committed to investigating tax evasion. The outcome of this case will have implications for the entire cryptocurrency industry and its relationship with government regulators.

FAQs

1. Is it illegal to trade cryptocurrencies without paying taxes?
No, it is not illegal to trade cryptocurrencies, but traders must report their transactions and pay capital gains tax on profits. Failure to do so can result in penalties and fines.
2. Why does the IRS want the identities of Kraken’s clients?
The IRS suspects that many cryptocurrency traders have underreported their tax obligations, and it wants to access their identities so it can investigate them further.
3. What are the implications of this case for the cryptocurrency industry?
If the IRS is successful in obtaining the identities of Kraken’s clients, it could set a precedent for other exchanges to comply with similar requests. This could have a chilling effect on the industry, driving traders and businesses away from the US and towards more privacy-friendly jurisdictions.
#

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/18358/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 04/27/2023 02:10
Next 04/27/2023 02:18

Recommended articles