AMM liquidity management agreement hacked, loses 90% of funds
It is reported that the AMM liquidity management agreement Revert Finance tweeted that the \”v3utils\” contract was attacked and 90% of the funds were stolen fro…
It is reported that the AMM liquidity management agreement Revert Finance tweeted that the “v3utils” contract was attacked and 90% of the funds were stolen from a single account. The stolen assets include: 22983.235188 USDCs, 4106.316699 USDTs, 485.578628769002 OPs, 0.18217977664322793 WETHs, 36.59093198260223 DAIs, 211.21463945524238 WMATIC and 22 Premia.
Revert Finance “v3utils” contract was attacked, 90% of asset losses came from a single account
Interpretation of the news:
Revert Finance, an Automated Market Maker (AMM) liquidity management agreement, took to Twitter to announce that its v3utils contract had been hacked, with 90% of the funds stolen from a single account. The hacker was able to access and steal a total of $22,269.59 worth of cryptocurrencies and tokens, including 22983.235188 USDCs, 4106.316699 USDTs, and 485.578628769002 OPs. The stolen assets also included a small amount of WETHs, DAIs, WMATIC, and 22 Premia tokens.
This isn’t the first time an AMM liquidity management agreement has been hacked; similar attacks on other AMMs and decentralized exchanges have become increasingly common over the past year as crypto prices have soared. Hackers have been able to exploit vulnerabilities in smart contracts and code to steal vast amounts of digital assets.
The v3utils contract is used by Revert Finance to manage liquidity pools on decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, which allow users to trade cryptocurrencies and other digital assets without a centralized intermediary. These pools rely on smart contracts to manage trades and generate fees for liquidity providers, who earn returns on their deposited assets.
The loss of funds is a significant blow to Revert Finance, which will need to address the security vulnerabilities in its smart contract to prevent further attacks. Additionally, the attack will likely affect the liquidity of the pools managed by the v3utils contract, which could discourage users from trading through Revert Finance.
In conclusion, the hack on Revert Finance’s v3utils contract highlights the continued need for increased security measures in DeFi protocols. The potential for large-scale thefts of digital assets remains a significant risk for both DeFi users and providers, and the successful recovery of stolen funds remains difficult. Revert Finance’s experience serves as another reminder that the DeFi industry is still in its early stages of development and has a long way to go before it can offer reliable, secure, and fully decentralized financial services.
This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/1733/
It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.