**Airbitrum Improvement Proposal (AIP-1) Receives Negative Vote**
According to reports, the snapshot page shows that the comprehensive governance package Airbitrum Improvement Proposal (AIP-1) initiated by the Airbitrum Foundation was not approve
According to reports, the snapshot page shows that the comprehensive governance package Airbitrum Improvement Proposal (AIP-1) initiated by the Airbitrum Foundation was not approved, with a negative vote of 76.67%.
The opposition rate to the proposal of Arbitrum AIP-1 reached 76.67%
**Introduction:**
Recently, reports have emerged that the Airbitrum Foundation’s comprehensive governance package, Airbitrum Improvement Proposal (AIP-1), did not receive approval. In fact, the vote for AIP-1 was negative, with 76.67% disapproving of it. In this article, we will delve deeper into what exactly AIP-1 is, what led to its rejection, and what this rejection means for the Airbitrum community.
**What Is Airbitrum Improvement Proposal (AIP-1)?**
Airbitrum Improvement Proposal (AIP-1) is a comprehensive governance package that was initiated by the Airbitrum Foundation. It aims to establish a robust and effective governance structure, which will ensure the efficient functioning of the Airbitrum network. AIP-1 comprises four key components:
1. AIP Process
2. Governance Model
3. Treasury Model
4. Monetary Policy
**What Led to the Rejection of AIP-1?**
Even though AIP-1 was proposed by the Airbitrum Foundation, it was ultimately up to the Airbitrum community to decide whether to approve it or not. Unfortunately, as reports suggest, the package was not approved, with a negative vote of 76.67%. This comes as a surprise to many, as AIP-1 was seen as a much-needed upgrade to the existing governance structure of the Airbitrum network.
So what led to the rejection of AIP-1? There are a few reasons that could have contributed to the negative vote. Firstly, many members of the Airbitrum community believed that the proposal lacked clarity on certain key components, such as the governance and treasury models. Secondly, there were concerns about the potential centralization of power within the Airbitrum Foundation, which could have led to a power imbalance in the governance structure. Finally, some members expressed concerns about the long-term sustainability of the Airbitrum network, given the proposed changes in the monetary policy.
**What Does the Rejection of AIP-1 Mean for the Airbitrum Community?**
The rejection of AIP-1 is undoubtedly a setback for the Airbitrum community. It means that the current governance structure will remain in place, which some members believe is inadequate for the network’s long-term growth and sustainability. However, it’s important to note that this rejection doesn’t mean that AIP-1 is off the table completely. The Airbitrum Foundation may choose to modify the proposal based on community feedback and then resubmit it for approval.
Furthermore, this rejection also highlights the importance of community participation in governance decisions. Airbitrum prides itself on being a decentralized network, where decision-making is done through a consensus mechanism. However, as the rejection of AIP-1 shows, community consensus can be challenging to achieve. Therefore, it’s crucial that the Airbitrum community remains engaged and actively participates in governance decisions to ensure the network’s continued success.
**Conclusion:**
The rejection of Airbitrum Improvement Proposal (AIP-1) is undoubtedly a blow to the Airbitrum community. The proposal’s comprehensive governance package aimed to establish a robust governance structure, but as reports indicate, it failed to garner enough support from the community. However, this rejection should not be seen as the end of AIP-1. The Airbitrum Foundation can modify the proposal based on community feedback and resubmit it for approval. Overall, this rejection highlights the importance of community participation in governance decisions, a core principle of the Airbitrum network.
**FAQs:**
1. **Why did AIP-1 fail to receive approval?**
The proposal lacked clarity on certain key components, such as the governance and treasury models, and some members expressed concerns about the potential centralization of power within the Airbitrum Foundation and the long-term sustainability of the network.
2. **What happens next now that AIP-1 has been rejected?**
The Airbitrum Foundation may choose to modify the proposal based on community feedback and then resubmit it for approval.
3. **What is the importance of community participation in governance decisions?**
Community participation is essential to ensure that the Airbitrum network remains decentralized and decisions are made through a consensus mechanism.
This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/12961/
It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.
Recommended articles
-
India’s Cryptocurrency Adoption: A Growing Market for Binance, Voyager, and Messari
12:00-21:00 Keywords: India, Binance, Voyager, Messari
Overview of important developments in the evening of February 23
Interpretation of the news…
-
BTC Miners’ Handling Fees Hit One Month Low
According to reports, the percentage of BTC miners\’ handling fee income has just reached 3.097% in the past hour (7d MA), a one month low.
BTC miners\’ commission income percentage -
Net Outflow of Digital Asset Investment Products: Analyzing Last Week’s Reports
According to reports, according to CoinShares, digital asset investment products had a net outflow of $30.4 million last week, ending six consecutive weeks of capital inflows. Amon
-
Prioritizing Depositors: A Strategic Move by US Treasury Secretary Yellen
On March 13, US Treasury Secretary Yellen said that regulators had been working hard to solve the bank failure in Silicon Valley all weekend, and the most important thing was to protect depositors rather than rescue investors. But she declined to disclose details of the potential solution. Yellen also said that during the financial crisis, investors and owners of systemically important banks were rescued. Now we will not do this again. The reform we have been carrying out all the time also means that we will not do this. We are concerned about depositors, and we will focus on meeting their needs. US Treasury Secretary Yellen: The regulators’ focus on the Silicon Valley banking case is to protect depositors rather than investors Analysis based on this information:In light of the recent Silicon Valley bank failure, US Treasury Secretary Yellen recently spoke to the media to provide updates on the nature of the issue and the steps that regulators have taken…
-
What is the price of Bitcoin (what is the concept of Bitcoin)
What is the price of Bitcoin? According to the Hotcoin market, Bitcoin has finally experienced a rebound after experiencing a period of decline. According to CoinMarketCap data, Bitcoin’s 24-hour growth reached 11.4%, while Ethereum (ETH) rose to more than 19.6% over the same period. In addition, from historical data, the price of Bitcoin fluctuates significantly. The price trend has been in a sideways trend from November 16, 2018 to the end of 2018. Since January 2019, Bitcoin prices have been declining and began to fluctuate and decline at the end of 2018. What is the price of Bitcoin What is the concept of Bitcoin? Where did it come from. What is Bitcoin, its origin and development process, have made many people wonder, what value does Bitcoin have Firstly, we know that Bitcoin is a digital gold belonging to the monetary system. Since its introduction in the white paper on January 2, 2008, there have been many discussions about cryptoassets and…
-
Blur vs. OpenSea: Who Paid More Royalties to Creators in March?
According to reports, Blur paid more royalties to creators in March than OpenSea, reaching $12.6 million, up from $11.2 million in February. In contrast, OpenSea\’s franchise fees h
-
Threshold Network Launches thUSD Stable Currency based on Liquidity Protocol Mechanism
On March 18th, the privacy network Threshold Network announced that the US dollar stable currency thUSD test network based on tBTC has been launched. This stable currency uses the Liquidity protocol mechanism for reference, and uses tBTC (a derivative token generated by Ethereum through a cross chain solution of Threshold Network) as collateral to generate USD stable currency thUSD. Threshold Network Announces thUSD Test Network Officially Launched Analysis based on this information:Threshold Network, the popular privacy network, recently announced the launch of thUSD, a United States dollar-based stable currency. According to the announcement, thUSD is based on the Liquidity protocol mechanism and uses tBTC as collateral. tBTC is a derivative token generated by Ethereum through a cross-chain solution of Threshold Network. The launch of this thUSD stable currency is a significant development for Threshold Network and the broader crypto ecosystem. Stable currencies such as thUSD are designed to offer cryptocurrency users a reliable and stable option to hold funds without…
-
#Listing of Euro Tether (EUR ₮) and Tether Gold (XAU ₮) on SimpleSwap Trading Platform: A Game Changer in Cryptocurrency Trading
On April 7th, Tether Operations Limited (Tether) announced that Euro Tether (EUR ₮) and Tether Gold (XAU ₮) have been listed on SimpleSwap, a real-time trading platform with a user
-
What is Exchange IEO (IEX Exchange App)?
What is Exchange IEO? Exchange IEO (Initial Exchange Offerings) is a new tradin
-
Cosmos Ecotoken Protocol Noble Partners with Circle to Bring Native USDCs to Cosmos and Inter Blockchain Communication (IBC) Ecosystem
On March 28th, the Cosmos Ecotoken Protocol Noble partnered with Circle to introduce native USDCs into the Cosmos and Inter Blockchain Communication (IBC) ecosystem. In an intervie
-
Brevan Howard Asset Management Acquires Dragonfly’s Liquid Opportunities Hedge Fund
According to reports, people familiar with the matter said that Brevan Howard Asset Management had reached an agreement with Dragonfly to take over Liquid Oppo…
-
What price is USDT for buying
USDT at what price to buy. According to USDT’s official information, at what price to buy USDT? When purchasing Bitcoin, a certain fee needs to be paid. Generally speaking, the higher the cost for investors, the greater the return; The lower the price during trading, the greater the risk. So what price point is USDT buying at? Let’s answer this question together. 1. What price is USDT for buying What price is USDT for buying. If someone wants to buy coins through an exchange to obtain legal tender, they need to pay to an account (or transfer funds to a certain address), and the system will automatically provide corresponding services. So using this platform allows users to directly sell fiat coins to others to buy. 2. How to buy 3: What is “hanging an order”?
-
Ferrum Network’s DeFi 2.0 Crucible Initiative aims for a Financially Sustainable Future
On March 8, it was reported that the DeFi 2.0 sustainable pledge product Crucible of Ferrum Network has been launched in Arbitrum.
DeFi 2.0 sustainable…
-
Stable Currency Bill Discussion Draft Released by The Financial Services Committee of the United States House of Representatives
According to reports, the Financial Services Committee of the United States House of Representatives released a landmark discussion draft of the stable currency bill on Saturday be
-
More than 151 million DOGE transferred from Coin An, with a value of over $12.09 million
According to reports, according to WhaleAlert monitoring, at 10:57151605154 DOGE items were transferred from Coin An to Unknown Wallet on April 23, Beijing time, with a value of ov
-
Animoca Brands Earns 5.5 Million US Dollars from Mocaverse NFT Coins
According to the report, the data shows that Animoca Brands has earned a total of 5.5 million US dollars from the mocaverse NFT coins. Today, the NFT series of…