1. PixelPlaygroundHome
  2. Blockchain Briefs

The Rejection of CB Recruitment’s Proposal to Pay a Sushi Chef $100,000

• Blockchain Briefs • 129 views

On March 20th, it was reported that the proposal of CB Recruitment, a blockchain recruitment company, to recruit Sushi Chef Jared Gray for Sushi DAO to receive a reward of US $1000

The Rejection of CB Recruitments Proposal to Pay a Sushi Chef $100,000

On March 20th, it was reported that the proposal of CB Recruitment, a blockchain recruitment company, to recruit Sushi Chef Jared Gray for Sushi DAO to receive a reward of US $100000 was not approved. According to data, about 80% of voters voted against or abstained from the proposal (55.26% opposed, 24.1% abstained), while among the 20% who wished to pay remuneration for CB Recruitment, Only 14% expect Sushi DAO to immediately pay them the required $100000 (USDC and SUSHI tokens valued at $50000, respectively).

Sushi DAO’s proposal to pay CB Recruitment $100000 for the recruitment of a chef was not approved

Introduction

On March 20th, it was reported that CB Recruitment, a blockchain recruitment company, had proposed to pay Sushi Chef Jared Gray a reward of US $100,000 for working with Sushi DAO. However, the proposal was rejected by the community. This article will explore the reasons behind the rejection of this proposal and its potential impact on the blockchain recruitment industry.

The Rejection of CB Recruitment’s Proposal

According to data, about 80% of voters voted against or abstained from the proposal (55.26% opposed, 24.1% abstained). Among the 20% who wished to pay remuneration for CB Recruitment, only 14% expected Sushi DAO to immediately pay them the required $100,000 (USDC and SUSHI tokens valued at $50,000, respectively). This suggests that the proposal was met with little enthusiasm from the community.
The primary reason behind the rejection of the proposal was the high salary offered to a single individual. Many community members felt that this was an unnecessary expense that could have been better spent elsewhere. Additionally, some members expressed concerns about the fairness of the selection process, and whether other chefs had been given a fair chance to compete for the position.

The Impact on the Blockchain Recruitment Industry

This rejection may have broader implications for the blockchain recruitment industry. Blockchain companies have been known to offer generous salaries and benefits to attract top talent, and this rejection sends a clear message to companies that this approach may not always be the most effective.
A more cost-effective and community-oriented approach may be necessary. Instead of offering high salaries to individuals, companies may need to explore more innovative recruitment strategies that are more inclusive and encourage community involvement.

Conclusion

The rejection of CB Recruitment’s proposal to pay a Sushi Chef $100,000 highlights the importance of community involvement in decision-making processes. This may have broader implications for the blockchain recruitment industry and may require companies to explore new recruitment strategies that prioritize inclusivity, cost-effectiveness, and community engagement.

FAQ’s

1. Why was the proposal to pay a Sushi Chef $100,000 rejected?
The proposal was rejected primarily because many community members felt that it was an unnecessary expense that could have been better spent elsewhere. Additionally, some members expressed concerns about the fairness of the selection process.
2. What was the percentage of people who opposed or abstained from the proposal?
About 80% of voters opposed or abstained from the proposal (55.26% opposed, 24.1% abstained).
3. What are the potential implications of this rejection for the blockchain recruitment industry?
This rejection may have broader implications for the blockchain recruitment industry and may require companies to explore new recruitment strategies that prioritize inclusivity, cost-effectiveness, and community engagement.
#

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/10515/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 03/20/2023 14:58
Next 03/20/2023 15:27

Recommended articles